Rick Reuschel is one of the most underappreciated players in baseball history
Rick Reuschel enjoyed a 19-year career that included multiple All Star appearances and Gold Gloves. The former 20-game winner finished with 214 wins and 2,015 strikeouts. “Big Daddy” had a portly build belied his athleticism. Reuschel earned two Gold Glove Awards. Runners were caught ste
Rick Reuschel is one of the most underappreciated players in baseball history
Rick Reuschel enjoyed a 19-year career that included multiple All Star appearances and Gold Gloves. The former 20-game winner finished with 214 wins and 2,015 strikeouts.
“Big Daddy” had a portly build belied his athleticism. Reuschel earned two Gold Glove Awards. Runners were caught stealing against him at 42% of the time compared to the league average 33%. Solid with the glove, his fielding percentage was 21 points better than league average.
A sabermetric darling, Reuschel’s career is best appreciated through the lens of advanced metrics. His strikeout-to-walk ratio is 31% better than league average. He gave up 21.6% fewer homers than his NL counterparts.
Reuschel played on some bad teams. His 214-191 record is good for a .528 winning percentage. When he wasn’t on the mound, his teams went 1358-1515, a .473 winning percentage. Reuschel’s mark is 55 points higher.
His career WAR is a stunning 69.5. That ranks just above the average for Hall of Fame pitchers. Among those with a lower WAR than Reuschel are no-doubt Hall of Famers Sandy Koufax, Bob Feller, and Carl Hubbell.
Reuschel pitched with bad defenses behind him. More than 10% of the runs he gave up were unearned. That no doubt hurt his win total. He was also hampered by his home park of more than a dozen years. Chicago’s Wrigley Field is one of the worst pitchers’ parks of his era.
Reuschel retired in 1991, well before the sabermetric revolution. Five years later when he was on the Hall of Fame ballot, only 2 of the 473 baseball writers voted for him.
As analysis of performance continues to improve, many are calling for a second look at Reuschel’s Cooperstown candidacy.
In the collection is this trio of Topps baseball cards. The middle card is from the 1977 set and is signed by the Reuschel brothers Rick and Paul. It’s flanked by 1978 Topps cards also autographed by the siblings.
Reuschel gave up Bo Jackson's memorable home run in the 1989 All Star Game
Bo Jackson’s performance in the 1989 All-Star Game at Anaheim Stadium remains legendary. In the bottom of the first inning, Jackson stepped up to the plate with the crowd buzzing. He faced Giants pitcher Rick Reuschel, who offered up a fastball over the plate. Jackson, with his trademark power, t
Reuschel gave up Bo Jackson's memorable home run in the 1989 All Star Game
Bo Jackson’s performance in the 1989 All-Star Game at Anaheim Stadium remains legendary. In the bottom of the first inning, Jackson stepped up to the plate with the crowd buzzing.
He faced Giants pitcher Rick Reuschel, who offered up a fastball over the plate. Jackson, with his trademark power, timed the pitch perfectly and launched the ball into the night sky.
It sailed over the outfield wall, becoming a memorable home run. The crowd erupted in excitement, recognizing the power and grace of one of the most gifted athletes in sports.
Jackson’s home run was a statement of his abilities, combining strength, timing, and raw athleticism. At that moment, he cemented his place as a fan favorite, thrilling the hometown crowd. The blast set the tone for a game filled with highlights, but it was Jackson’s towering homer that stood out.
The image above shows a short note from Bo thanking a fan for supporting his baseball career with the Royals. Notice the Montgomery, Alabama postmark dated February 23, 1987 on the accompanying envelope.
Bo and Wade Boggs went deep off of Rick and became the first All Star duo to lead off the first with homers
On July 11, 1989, during the 66th MLB All-Star Game at Anaheim Stadium, Bo Jackson and Wade Boggs made history. They became the first pair of players in All-Star history to lead off the first inning with back-to-back home runs. Rick Reuschel, the National League pitcher, took the mound and quickl
Rick Reuschel, the National League pitcher, took the mound and quickly became the victim of the blasts. Jackson smashed a towering home run, setting the tone for the game.
In the announcer’s booth was Vin Scully, joined by guest and former president Ronald Reagan. After Jackson’s ball landed in the stands, Boggs worked the count to 3-and-2. On the next pitch, the Hall of Fame third baseman hammered Reuschel’s full-count offering. As the ball took flight, Reagan chimed in, “Hey, that looks like it’s going there too!”
Scully described the scene, “A rather electrifying moment here in Anaheim. With the National League leading two-to-nothing, consecutive home runs by Bo Jackson and Wade Boggs.”
These two early homers immediately erased the National League’s 2-run lead and tied the game. Jackson’s raw power and Boggs’ hitting precision sparked the offense and helped the American League maintain control.
The game ended with a 5-3 victory for the American League, with the heroics of Jackson and Boggs heroics playing a key role in the win. Jackson, a dual-sport star, and Boggs, a hitting legend, left their mark on the 66th All-Star Game, making it one of the most exciting starts in MLB history.
In the collection is a contract signed by Wade Boggs agreeing to have his signature appear on souvenir baseballs with stamped autographs.
The terms of the contract?
Boggs received one cent per ball sold. Interestingly Boggs signed the contract on March 7, 1982 but would not debut in the big leagues until April 10 later that year.
Wins are useful but often misleading. In 3548.1 innings Rick Reuschel had a WAA(wins above average of 37.9 according to baseball Reference. He should have been about 235-157 losses (37.9+(348.333/18)=37.9+197.1=235- (37.9*2)=235-157
Now he did not come close to that with 214=191 record because he got terrible run support for his career. He allowed 3.79 RA9 (runs per game) and the teams he pitched on in the parks they played in and the defensive they support received should have gotten 4.66 RA (runs per game allowed) which is how we arrive at about a 235-157 record. Only Reuschel only got 4.09 runs per game support for his career, and he pitched out of a very deep hole for his career. (see the career line here https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/reuscri01.shtml And pay attention to the career line in Player Value—–Pitching
When controlled for what I call team factor they were a .435 team (4.09/4.66)=.8777 squared=.770 divided by itself + one (1) or .770/1.770= .435. Now when we compare his support to the runs he allowed we would expect him to have a .538 win-lost percentage. 4.09/3.79=1.079squared=1.165 divided by 2/165=1.165/2.165=.538 But on his teams an average pitcher would have gotten 4.66 runs like the line on the Baseball Reference page and that means he would have been a .599 pitcher. Instead he was a .599 pitcher dressed in .528 won-lost stat attire.
And we can further proof that by using the .435 team factor in a formula or .500+(.528-.435)=.593. So think of him in a neutral world as somewhere between a .593 and .599 pitcher who would probably have been in the HOF for about 15 years
Big Daddy belongs in the Hall of Fame!
Wins are useful but often misleading. In 3548.1 innings Rick Reuschel had a WAA(wins above average of 37.9 according to baseball Reference. He should have been about 235-157 losses (37.9+(348.333/18)=37.9+197.1=235- (37.9*2)=235-157
Now he did not come close to that with 214=191 record because he got terrible run support for his career. He allowed 3.79 RA9 (runs per game) and the teams he pitched on in the parks they played in and the defensive they support received should have gotten 4.66 RA (runs per game allowed) which is how we arrive at about a 235-157 record. Only Reuschel only got 4.09 runs per game support for his career, and he pitched out of a very deep hole for his career. (see the career line here https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/reuscri01.shtml And pay attention to the career line in Player Value—–Pitching
When controlled for what I call team factor they were a .435 team (4.09/4.66)=.8777 squared=.770 divided by itself + one (1) or .770/1.770= .435. Now when we compare his support to the runs he allowed we would expect him to have a .538 win-lost percentage. 4.09/3.79=1.079squared=1.165 divided by 2/165=1.165/2.165=.538 But on his teams an average pitcher would have gotten 4.66 runs like the line on the Baseball Reference page and that means he would have been a .599 pitcher. Instead he was a .599 pitcher dressed in .528 won-lost stat attire.
And we can further proof that by using the .435 team factor in a formula or .500+(.528-.435)=.593. So think of him in a neutral world as somewhere between a .593 and .599 pitcher who would probably have been in the HOF for about 15 years